https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=4115828&post_id=186622814&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=rovhk&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0NjUxMDE4NCwicG9zdF9pZCI6MTg2NjIyODE0LCJpYXQiOjE3NzAwNTE3NzMsImV4cCI6MTc3MjY0Mzc3MywiaXNzIjoicHViLTQxMTU4MjgiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.ZEmT1mDKMGek_Hyvvd0HfIqLK3UMEozZc5668kUHrp0
~~ recommended by newestbeginning ~~
|
 |
What’s Being Reported
On November 5, 2024, Elon Musk stood at the center of the most expansive criminal and civil exposure ever faced by a single individual, a moment where two hundred seventy million dollars spent to secure a presidential outcome functioned as the bargain of the century, a calculated move to escape justice, preserve power, and shield an empire from collapse.
At that point in time it’s reported that eleven federal agencies were investigating his conduct, six active criminal investigations remained open, seven subpoenas stood unanswered including one tied directly to the Epstein and JPMorgan sex trafficking case, more than thirty five civil lawsuits pressed forward, over a dozen countries pursued parallel inquiries, documented liability reached two point three billion dollars, federal and classified contracts totaling twenty one point eight billion dollars hung in the balance, and potential prison exposure exceeded eighty years.
The Department of Justice pursued Musk and Tesla for securities fraud tied to false claims about Autopilot, wire fraud connected to full self driving representations, staged video fraud, and conduct described as glass house fraud, each carrying exposure reaching twenty years. Brazil opened criminal investigations into obstruction of justice, criminal organization activity, and incitement of crime, moving well beyond diplomatic tension into criminal enforcement. These were not abstract risks. These were live cases advancing toward consequences.
One subpoena carried exceptional gravity. On April 28, 2023, the United States Virgin Islands subpoenaed Musk in the Epstein and JPMorgan sex trafficking litigation. Investigators demanded all communications between Musk and Epstein, all documents related to Epstein human trafficking operations, records of fees paid to Epstein, and information detailing Epstein role in Musk finances. Musk avoided service, forcing authorities to serve Tesla instead. By November 5, 2024, the subpoena remained open and unanswered.
Other subpoenas reinforced the pressure. The Securities and Exchange Commission investigated Twitter takeover fraud. The Department of Justice issued multiple subpoenas tied to Tesla Autopilot fraud. Another Justice Department investigation targeted SpaceX hiring discrimination. A Senate probe examined contacts with Russia. None of these matters reached resolution before the election.
Federal agency scrutiny stretched across nearly every regulatory domain. The SEC ran four separate investigations. The Department of Justice handled four criminal probes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigated Autopilot related deaths involving more than seventeen fatalities and over thirty five crashes. The Federal Aviation Administration proposed a six hundred thirty thousand dollar fine tied to SpaceX violations. The National Labor Relations Board pursued more than twenty cases involving illegal firings. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission investigated racial harassment. OSHA cited unsafe working conditions. The EPA, FTC, and Department of Defense tracked multiple violations.
Security clearance failures compounded the exposure. The Air Force rejected Musk high level clearance application after citing security risks. Nine countries raised concerns regarding access to classified information. The Department of Defense opened three separate security investigations. Classified contracts exceeding ten billion dollars faced immediate risk.
International investigations intensified. Brazil launched four criminal investigations, banned platform operations in August 2024, and froze Starlink finances. The European Union pursued Digital Services Act violations with fines reaching up to six percent of global revenue. France accepted a criminal cyber harassment complaint. Australia, the United Kingdom, India, and more than nine additional countries opened inquiries of their own.
Civil litigation expanded across multiple fronts. Eight SpaceX employees filed claims alleging sexual harassment and wrongful termination. California pursued racial harassment claims tied to Tesla. Multiple families brought wrongful death suits tied to Autopilot failures, with at least six active cases. Delaware courts voided a fifty five billion dollar pay package. Former Twitter executives sought two hundred million dollars in unpaid severance. Ben Brody pursued defamation damages exceeding one million dollars. Pennsylvania voters challenged an illegal one million dollar lottery.
While the financial exposure reached staggering proportions, criminal exposure exceeded eighty years of potential prison time. Federal fines ranged from five hundred million to one billion dollars. International fines added two hundred million to five hundred million more. Civil settlements ranged from five hundred million to one billion dollars. Federal contracts at risk totaled eleven point eight billion dollars. Classified contracts at risk exceeded ten billion dollars. Total exposure surpassed twenty four billion dollars.
Then the election ended. Within weeks, the Department of Justice dropped the SpaceX case. More than seventeen Inspectors General lost their positions. Agency heads overseeing investigations were removed. Over forty investigations went silent. Musk gained control of DOGE and assumed oversight authority over agencies responsible for investigating him. The subject of enforcement gained influence over enforcement itself.
Here Are The Numbers
Federal criminal and civil penalties tied to DOJ, SEC, NHTSA, FAA, NLRB, EEOC, OSHA, EPA, FTC, and DoD investigations reasonably sat between five hundred million and one billion dollars, a range consistent with multi agency enforcement actions involving securities fraud, safety violations, labor violations, and government contracting misconduct.
International penalties driven by Brazil, the European Union, France, and other countries add another two hundred million to five hundred million dollars, with the EU Digital Services Act alone carrying exposure up to six percent of global revenue for qualifying violations.
Civil litigation settlements and judgments across more than thirty five active lawsuits would likely total five hundred million to one billion dollars, factoring in wrongful death cases, employment claims, defamation, severance disputes, and state level harassment actions.
The largest financial risk sat inside government contracts. Federal contracts at risk totaled approximately eleven point eight billion dollars, and classified contracts at risk exceeded ten billion dollars, meaning more than twenty one billion dollars in revenue exposure tied directly to regulatory trust, security clearances, and agency approval.
When those figures are added together, the documented exposure reaches twenty four billion dollars at the low end, with credible pathways pushing the total closer to thirty billion dollars if penalties, settlements, and contract losses stacked instead of resolving quietly.
Frankly, these dollar figures still understate the true cost.
Criminal convictions would have triggered executive disqualification risks, forced leadership changes, permanent loss of security clearances, suspension or termination of government contracting eligibility, cascading shareholder litigation, and long term damage to brand value and market confidence that cannot be neatly priced.
Measured against that reality, paying two hundred seventy million dollars to make forty eight legal problems stop moving forward was not reckless spending. It was an extraordinarily efficient transaction.
Oligarchy in Action
The payoff tells the story. An investment of two hundred seventy million dollars protected at almost two point four billion dollars in fines, secured twenty one point eight billion dollars in contracts, and erased more than eighty years of potential prison time. The return reached approximately eight thousand nine hundred percent.
This spending was not a political donation. It functioned as a survival investment designed to avoid federal prison, prevent losses exceeding twenty four billion dollars, shut down criminal prosecution across multiple jurisdictions, preserve security clearances, and keep a business empire intact. Some argue he bought the presidency to escape litigation and justice.
A strong argument existed that no prior moment in American government history reflected a conflict of interest of this magnitude. Was this democracy at work, or were the ugly wheels of oligarchy turning right before our eyes?
Mitch Jackson, Esq
No comments:
Post a Comment