https://scheerpost.com/2025/12/07/hillary-clinton-condemns-all-suffering-except-the-one-we-pay-for/
https://youtu.be/YNf-nDuoGGw?si=Rd4T3zzwTUFKcAxY
~~ recommended by collectivist action ~~
In one of the scariest moments in modern history, we're doing our best at ScheerPost to pierce the fog of lies that conceal it but we need some help to pay our writers and staff. Please consider a tax-deductible donation.By: Joshua Scheer, Columnist
Hillary Clinton doubles down on “misinformed youth” remarks at Doha Forum
At the Doha Forum today, Hillary Clinton reiterated comments from last week’s Israel Hayom Summit, claiming that young people who are pro-Palestinian are being misled by social media and are getting an “incomplete” view of the conflict.
While acknowledging that the suffering in Gaza is “horrific,” Clinton stressed that focusing exclusively on one conflict overlooks broader global crises. “Suffering everywhere is horrific,” she said, listing conflicts in Israel, Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan and eastern Congo.
Clinton added, “I am angry about all of the human rights abuses. I’m angry about all the excessive uses of force. I’m angry about what happened on October 7 in Israel. I’m angry about what happened in Gaza. I’m angry about what Russia is doing to Ukraine. I’m angry about what is happening in Sudan. I’m angry about what is happening in eastern Congo.”
Here is the video cut by Drop Site News
Hillary says “Suffering everywhere is horrific… full stop” And yes, suffering everywhere is horrific. However, the suffering we are talking about in Israel is state-sponsored — and we fund it. There is a glaring double standard, as I noted yesterday: state-sponsored terror that Clinton has been complicit in is treated differently. She also said that our leaders have stood up for human rights — since when? Please tell me. I’m thinking maybe FDR — but even he did so while imprisoning Japanese civilians. So really, when has the United States genuinely championed human rights for anything beyond its own interests? She also said our leaders stood up for democracy and freedom — I’m guessing she means Vietnam and Korea. In Vietnam alone, over three million people died, more than 10 million were displaced from South Vietnam, and over 100,000 U.S. soldiers, many of them drafted, were killed. Not to mention landmines and Cambodia and her friend Henry Kissinger.
About Landmines just this week the deaths from them hit a five-year high, Also, I’ll end with democracy and freedom — let’s talk about Iraq in 1991.
The U.S. funded and supported Saddam Hussein in his use of chemical weapons against Iranians and his own people, from Foreign Policy “The U.S. knew Hussein was launching some of the worst chemical attacks in history — and still gave him a hand. Then turned around and attacked him for it for years, imposing sanctions that his people suffered under. Later, we invented lies to justify going to war with him again—a war that Hillary, as a senator, supported. We constantly told the world how terrible this man was for using chemical weapons on civilians, yet many failed to mention that we had provided him with those weapons in the first place. It was essentially our proxy war with Russia and Iran that enabled it.
Clinton also repeated the lie in 2003 that Iraq was housing al-Qaeda terrorists and that the vote was as she said: “This is a very difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I’ve ever had to make. Any vote that might lead to war should it be hard, but I cast it with conviction.” Too bad she doesn’t have that conviction about the abuses being done by the Israeli government. I would wonder if Ocotber 7 tyoe attack had happened against Saddam what she might have said?
To swing back to war buddies: Kissinger and she are so close a whole article is written about it from ABC News: “The two former secretaries of state have been close for years, with Clinton calling him “a friend” and noting that she “relied on his counsel” when she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013.” There’s more — and let’s not forget Madeleine Albright, who infamously said the deaths of Iraqi children were “worth it.” Is this the kind of leader Clinton is praising?
Then this chestnut from 2016
Sadly, both Albright and Kissinger passed away after doing maximum damage. I often think about the concept of hell, and I wonder if they’ve found the “special place” Albright once spoke of. Honestly, they may already be serving as advisers to the devil.
To end this tangent inspired by Hillary’s words, let’s not forget that the leaders of this country built it on slavery and on the taking of land that never belonged to the U.S., aside from what the Church claimed to justify it.
If suffering is truly horrific — and we are sending money and support to one regime that is killing a largely civilian population — then there must be accountability, not double standards.
Here is Hillary on Trump — her words about Trump moving away from core American values and supporting Russia’s war in Ukraine.
What great values under Biden: We fund Ukraine and treat Russia with sanctions — yes, I repeat myself, sanctions them — while Israel, Biden and Harris gaslight our population, telling us how badly Israel is behaving, but doing nothing. With Harris writing her latest book, basically wiping away many of her failures onto others, she writes about a meeting with Bibi. This reporting is from The Forward from a meeting in 2024: “Netanyahu’s hooded gaze and disengaged demeanor made it clear to me that he was running out the clock,” she writes. In remarks to the media after the meeting, Harris called it “frank and constructive” yet criticized Israel’s execution of the war. In her book, Harris describes it as “unproductive.” Why not talk about that in real time and put pressure on a regime that relies on us so heavily?
Clinton also said in her talk that both Biden and Trump could have been more “assertive” in dealing with Putin. An honest question: does that mean starting a nuclear war? Seriously. Biden was a cheerleader for the Russian war, but he still had limits: Only last November did he allow the Ukrainians to strike at targets deep in Russian territory — but Russia is a sovereign nation with nuclear weapons. So where does that leave any real room to be more “assertive?”
Hillary has been saber-rattling about Putin for a long time. I can only imagine how the United States would have been involved in fighting Russia if she had won in 2016. That election had a lot of talk about Russia, and I don’t want to lose the thread: Hillary said her “beef” with Putin stems from his handling of the 2011 parliamentary elections, which she described as “unfair, not free, illegitimate.” I’ve already rambled long enough to get into Russiagate, but I’ll just remind people of what I said at the time: Hillary said what she said, the DNC did what it did, yet somehow the hacking was framed as the real problem. As I said yesterday — if you do the right things for the right reasons, maybe you don’t have to hide what you say.
To swing back to Israel and its regime without sanctions, we held and hold the purse strings, we are Israel’s biggest funder and Joe Biden was supposed to be Bibi’s friend, and yet we got a genocide. For those who want context from the Council on Foreign Relations: mainstream Israel has received $300 billion in U.S. aid since its founding. The next closest recipient, Egypt, has received less than $200 billion. Of that aid to Israel, 75% has gone to the military. Again, it should be repeated: If we keep giving money to our militaries, they will always need things to shoot at and blow up. And in this case — as in most cases — those “things” are human beings who have done nothing other than try to live somewhere in peace.
Another fact for Hillary to consider, since she is discussing the war in Russia, note in the Ukraine war, Ukrainian civilian casualties are around 14,000. That does not include military personnel, where Russia has reportedly lost nearly a million people, not to mention the arms loss and other catastrophic consequences.
In September, the death toll for the murder of the Gazan people passed 64,000 — and these are not military service members; these are innocents. By the way, many military service members in the conflicts of which we speak have no agency and are being “forced” to fight for a number of reasons.
But why, Hillary, are you so bloodthirsty that these people don’t count? Is it because of October 7? Is that why so many should be allowed to die?
I repeat myself because maybe, if we ask enough damn times, they won’t be able to hide it anymore: Why does Vladimir Putin face sanctions while we fund his opponent — and why do we fund Israel’s regime? These are the questions Hillary needs to answer, not vague lines about “suffering everywhere.” Yes—suffering is bad everywhere, and it should stop. But in this case, with a genocide we directly bankroll, we actually have the power to stop it, and we must stop it.
Here is a longer part of her interview if you can stomach it:
No comments:
Post a Comment