https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/22/realestate/trump-fair-housing-laws.html
~~ recommended by newestbeginning ~~
NB note: There are endless articles chronicling the utter corruption being enforced by the Fascist Regime. Below is one about the stopping of the enforcement of Fair Housing Laws.
Over the weekend, the Regime announced a new $100,000 fee for H1B visas throwing tech and other businesses into utter chaos because of how poorly thought through the announcement was, no one knew who would be subject to the fees, etc. As Krugman says:
Trump’s visa proclamation basically gave his officials open-ended authority to waive the fees for people and companies they like:
The restriction imposed pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall not apply to any individual alien, all aliens working for a company, or all aliens working in an industry, if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines, in the Secretary’s discretion, that the hiring of such aliens to be employed as H-1B specialty occupation workers is in the national interest and does not pose a threat to the security or welfare of the United States.
The potential for corruption — for using selective granting or withdrawal of visas to extract political favors and outright bribes — is obvious. “Nice tech company you have here. It would be a shame if something were to happen to your work force.” Will Trump and company abuse this power? Do bears do their business in the woods?
Another article:
The S.E.C. Drops Efforts to Recoup Funds From Trump Clemency Recipients
Devon Archer, Trevor Milton and Carlos Watson were convicted in fraud schemes totaling hundreds of millions of dollars. Now, they will not be required by the government to pay back victims.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/19/us/politics/sec-trump-
Following is a link to a Ta-Nehisi Coates article about the sanitizing and sane washing of the Charlie Kirk legacy
Charlie Kirk, Redeemed by Ezra Klein, Gavin Newsom, and the Political Class
~~ and finally a little comic relief. Thanks Andy Borowitz!
BURBANK (The Borowitz Report)—Hoping to stop the bleeding after millions boycotted its products, Disney announced on Monday that it was launching a new late-night comedy show on ABC starring Kash Patel. Patel, who earlier this month was replaced as FBI director by a startled deer, received a ringing endorsement from Disney CEO Bob Iger. “We’re confident that all of Kash’s jokes will be acceptable to the president, especially since his head writer will be Stephen Miller,” Iger said. Urging viewers to “give Kash a chance,” Iger added, “If he’s even half as funny as he was at the Senate last week, this show is going to be huge.” XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
Trump Appointees Roll Back Enforcement of Fair Housing Laws
Interviews and internal documents show that signature civil rights protections in housing are being dismissed as ideologically driven and D.E.I. in disguise.
Debra Kamin reviewed dozens of memos, text messages and emails written by employees of HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity.
In one email, a Trump appointee at the Department of Housing and Urban Development described decades of housing discrimination cases as “artificial, arbitrary and unnecessary.”
In another, a career supervisor in the department’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity objected to lawyers being reassigned to other offices; the supervisor was fired six days later for insubordination.
In a third, the office’s director of enforcement warned that Trump appointees were using gag orders and intimidation to block discrimination cases from moving forward. The urgent message was sent to a U.S. senator, who is referring it to the department’s acting inspector general for investigation.
The emails are among dozens of pages of internal communications, memos and other documents reviewed by The New York Times that show efforts by the Trump administration to limit enforcement of the Fair Housing Act, the landmark civil rights law that has prohibited discrimination in housing for nearly six decades.
In interviews, half a dozen current and former employees of HUD’s fair housing office said that the Trump political appointees had made it nearly impossible for them to do their jobs, which involve investigating and prosecuting landlords, real estate agents, lenders and others who discriminate based on race, religion, gender, family status or disability.
Several lawyers said they had been blocked from communicating with clients without approval from a Trump appointee, and had been barred from citing some past housing civil rights cases when researching legal precedent for possible new prosecutions.
One internal memo from a top Trump appointee in the office said that archival documents that were “contrary to administration policy” would be removed or replaced, and that “tenuous theories of discrimination” would no longer be pursued.
“If you’re not enforcing the Fair Housing Act, then it’s just another dead law,” said one of the career lawyers in the office, Palmer Heenan, who has been told without explanation that he will be reassigned next month.
65%
The staff reduction at HUD’s fair housing office
Some of the internal documents framed the changes as efficiency measures, and the resulting cuts to the office have been drastic. When the so-called Department of Government Efficiency initiated its cost-cutting spree, federal offices lost, on average, about 10 percent of their employees. Within the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, the reduction was 65 percent. There were 31 employees in January; once mandatory transfers go through next month, there will be 11.
Kasey Lovett, a spokeswoman for HUD, said in a statement that it was “patently false” to suggest the department was looking to blunt enforcement of the Fair Housing Act. The Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, she said, “is using its authority to uphold the law, protect the vulnerable, and ensure meaningful access to housing.”
Ms. Lovett also said that the new administration had inherited a “deeply inefficient case system,” and accused the Biden administration of allowing cases to “languish.”
Since President Trump took office, the department has handled over 4,100 cases, according to the statement, which is on par with previous years, accounting for cases that carry over from one year to another. Ms. Lovett did not address, however, how many of the cases had been investigated or had resulted in legal action.
Lawyers in the office contend that cases often take longer than expected because of complexity and insufficient resources. Before the cuts, the office had 22 lawyers working on fair housing cases, fielding around 2,000 new complaints a year. Local fair housing nonprofits receive around 32,000 additional inquiries each year.
32,000
The number of inquiries made to local fair housing nonprofits each year
By Oct. 5, when the latest rounds of reductions will take place, there will be six of those lawyers remaining, according to several staff members who have received notices of reassignment.
“I never thought I would be in this position,” said Paul Osadebe, another fair housing lawyer. “We have people who are trying to destroy a baseline that people relied on.”
More concerning than the vacant desks, the current and former employees said, were the hundreds of cases that had been halted or dropped.
6
The number of lawyers who will soon remain at HUD’s fair housing office, down from 22 lawyers
The shift began during President Trump’s first week in office, they said, when he issued a series of executive orders targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in both the public and private sectors.
That same week, fair housing employees received a stop-work order via email from HUD leadership, ordering them to “cease and desist all work activities associated with environmental justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion.”
In short, the staff members said, much of the office’s fair housing work was being characterized as an offshoot of D.E.I. Documents reviewed by The Times show that the work was repeatedly referred to as “not a priority of the administration.”
Are you a federal worker? We want to hear from you.
The Times would like to hear about your experience as a federal worker under the second Trump administration. We may reach out about your submission, but we will not publish any part of your response without contacting you first.
Data from the first seven months of the Trump administration show the nearly instant results of the changes.
In each of the last five years, the fair housing office typically collected between $4 million and $8 million in legal settlements for Americans who accused housing providers of discrimination. From January to July, however, the office approved less than $200,000, said Jacy Gaige, until recently its director of enforcement.
4
Charges of discrimination issued by HUD’s fair housing office since Trump took office, down from an average of 35 a year
Charges of discrimination are also sharply down. When investigators find evidence of a crime, they issue a formal document that requires the accused to appear before a judge. On an average year, HUD issues 35 charges; since the beginning of the Trump administration, there have been four, according to lawyers in the office.
‘Tenuous Theories of Discrimination’
The slowdown can be traced, at least in part, to new procedures that stripped career officials of the authority to approve settlements or issue charges, said Ms. Gaige, a career employee for the past 13 years.
Instead, only a small number of Trump appointees now have that authority. While every new administration brings political appointees to top roles, not one has monopolized the work flow so thoroughly, including the first Trump administration, Ms. Gaige said.
“With one email, the entire process was shut down,” she said. “It essentially stopped the settlement process, which is time sensitive because complainants and respondents come to an agreement about what they want to do to resolve a case. And often that is driven by specific deadlines that are occurring in people’s lives.”
In addition, hundreds of pending fair housing cases were frozen, and some settlements revoked, even when accusations of discrimination had been substantiated, according to the interviews and the internal communications.
In one instance, a large homeowner’s association in Texas was found to have banned the use of housing vouchers by Black residents. That case had been referred to the Justice Department, but the referral was abruptly withdrawn by the new Trump appointees.
“The sudden abandonment of the case was a pretty significant about-face,” said Rebecca Livengood, a lawyer with Relman Colfax in Washington, D.C., who represented the housing authority that had sued the homeowner’s association. “There’s every reason to think that in another administration, what were, at that point, sustained allegations of widespread racial discrimination would have been pursued.”
Fair housing cases have historically covered a broad range of civil rights violations.
They have involved landlords refusing to rent to single mothers with children, or people of a certain religion. They have combated discrimination against disabled veterans who needed to live with a service animal. They have targeted real estate agents who did not want to show Black buyers homes in white neighborhoods. And in recent years, they have protected survivors of domestic violence from being denied housing assistance when attempting to escape a stalker or abuser.
Last week, John Gibbs, the Trump-appointed principal deputy assistant secretary for fair housing, sent two memos detailing how “future enforcement efforts will proceed.”
In previous administrations, he wrote, fair housing offices “leveraged the Fair Housing Act” against mortgage providers, appraisers and others “in an ideological matter,” but that would now change.
Cases involving “tenuous theories of discrimination” would “no longer be prioritized,” he wrote.
The types of cases identified by Mr. Gibbs had been central to the office’s work.
They included appraisal bias, which typically involves white appraisers undervaluing homes owned by Black families; zoning restrictions used to block housing that might be occupied by Black and Latino families; and gender or gender expression cases, including new housing protections added under the Biden administration.
The memos also described previous approaches to redlining and reverse redlining as “legally unsound.” The two racist practices involve denying mortgages to minorities and those in minority neighborhoods, and other predatory and discriminatory lending practices. A full review of the organization’s guidance on those subjects, he added, was ongoing.
‘In Mortal Danger’
The staff reassignments and cuts have been particularly hard felt in the handling of housing complaints under the Violence Against Women Act, a 1994 law designed to protect women from stalking, assault and domestic violence that was updated in 2022 to include new housing protections for the growing number of survivors of domestic violence.
About 500 women a year reach out to HUD to request help under the law, but only two of the six lawyers remaining in the fair housing office have experience with the law, according to interviews with the lawyers.
“These are life and death requests,” said Mr. Osadebe, one of the lawyers being transferred next month. “These women are legitimately in mortal danger, and often without the government stepping in, nothing will be done.”
Mr. Osadebe said he and his fellow lawyers were told in January that they could not communicate directly with the people who filed complaints, making it virtually impossible to do their jobs. “They cut us out of the process,” he said.
Mr. Osadebe is an organizer with the Federal Unionists Network, a group of workers and their supporters who are working across the federal government to push back against the Trump administration changes.
“This is a deliberate plan, and it’s about shutting down fair housing,” he said.
‘Dire Consequences’
Ms. Gaige took a different protest route. She quit in July, but only after firing off an email to Senator Elizabeth Warren, the ranking Democrat on the Senate committee responsible for overseeing HUD.
The nation’s fair housing laws were no longer being enforced, she wrote. Someone needed to intervene.
Others in the office sounded the alarm as well.
Erik Heins, a lawyer in charge of enforcement, wrote two emails to HUD’s Office of General Counsel in June, outlining the serious repercussions of the staffing reassignments to other offices.
“It was very clear pretty quickly that this was not about solving a need in those offices,” Mr. Heins said in an interview. “My staff was being retaliated against for being civil rights practitioners, and losing a dozen civil rights attorneys would cripple HUD’s ability to enforce its civil rights protections.”
Six days after sending those emails, he was informed by Amy Brown, HUD’s deputy general counsel for housing programs, that he had engaged in “unacceptable conduct.” He was fired the same day.
“As a manager, you are expected to be professional and trustworthy in your conduct to support the Agency’s goals and mission,” Ms. Brown wrote.
In other emails about the cuts and reassignments, HUD managers told lawyers who raised concerns that they “appreciate your feedback,” but were committed to having a “full-time staff reassigned who are fully committed to the workload, goals and objectives of that office.”
Those not wanting to be “voluntarily reassigned” were told that they would be “subject to removal,” according to memos reviewed by The Times.
Early this month, four current staff members of the fair housing office also reached out to Ms. Warren and provided her with documents they had compiled backing up their allegations.
On Monday, according to a spokesman for Ms. Warren, the senator sent a request to Brian Harrison, HUD’s acting inspector general, to open an investigation into the office. The allegations, she wrote, “suggest that HUD is no longer enforcing Fair Housing and Civil Rights Laws — with dire consequences.”
Mr. Osadebe, who like some of the lawyers describes himself as a whistleblower, said he knows his job may be on the line for speaking up.
“We took an oath to defend the constitution,” he said. “These are the moments we took that oath for.”
No comments:
Post a Comment