and
~~ recommended by newestbeginning ~~
Two articles follow about Trump's dangerous military aggression and escalation in the Middle East.
| Just Stop The Fucking Genocide And Red Sea Shipping Will Be Safe | ||
| ||
 | ||
Gaza in October 2023. Via Palestinian News & Information Agency (Wafa), under CC-BY-SA 3. |
CONSPICUOUS IN PRESIDENT Trump’s declaration that the U.S. will resume bombing Yemen was the lack of anything like a strategy to produce the end of Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping. "We will use overwhelming lethal force until we have achieved our objective," is the closest he came, but that's just a description of means and aims, with the hope that enough bombs will compel a Houthi surrender. The Houthis' ability to withstand a decade of Saudi, American and occasionally Israeli bombs and cruise missiles shows they won't. Now not only is Israel back to its U.S.-backed genocide in Gaza, the regional war in the Middle East spilling out from it is back on. There is a surefire way to stop attacks on Red Sea shipping and U.S. Naval vessels. The Trump administration secured it in January, to great regional fanfare and the humiliation of Democrats: Force a ceasefire on Israel. But the administration is actively undermining the ceasefire while attempting to cast Hamas as the intransigent party, a move that clears the decks for as much ethnic cleansing as Israel can get away with. If this sounds familiar, that's because in January 2024 I wrote pretty much the same thing when the Biden administration was doing what the Trump administration is doing now. The Houthis, AKA Ansar Allah, who govern northern Yemen, to include areas on the Red Sea coast, held Red Sea shipping at risk as a measure to impose economic pressure on Israel from parties both involved and not involved in Gaza. Instead, the Biden administration denied linkage between Gaza and the Red Sea attacks and assembled a fig-leaf naval coalition to break the Houthis’ siege of the trade route. It failed. All it produced was what an Associated Press reporter, aboard a U.S. Destroyer in the Red Sea, called the "most intense running sea battle the Navy has faced since World War II." A campaign meant to assert the might of what is unquestionably the most powerful Navy on earth instead showcased its impotence against an overmatched but determined force with the backing of Iran. But then something worked—predictably—and it wasn't more Tomahawks. I'm going to quote from the eleventh paragraph of the New York Times' story on Sunday about the renewed bombing campaign:
Got that? Could it be clearer? Ansar Allah did what they said they were going to do. When there was a prospect for a durable peace in Gaza, the Houthis stood down so it could take root. But then what happened, New York Times?
Israel isn't the only aggressor here. So is Israel's American patron. Once Trump defeated Netanyahu's hated Biden, Israel agreed to a ceasefire it had resisted—but up to a point. That point, as FOREVER WARS forecasted all the way back in June when the ceasefire plan emerged, was the first 40-day phase of ceasefire and hostage exchange. Hamas has taken the position that the ceasefire ought to progress to the second phase of the deal, which involves not only additional hostage exchanges but negotiations on Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza and a lasting end to the post-October 7 war. Instead, Israel, backed by Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, is trying to extend the timespan of the first phase, the one that gives Israel its hostages back but keeps the sword of the IDF on the Palestinian throat. That is fundamentally a different deal than the one Hamas agreed to. Since Hamas can't accept that, Washington and Tel Aviv have a mechanism to portray Hamas and not themselves as the rejectionist parties. Ansar Allah is calling the bluff, and Trump, who has no problem substituting endless violence for strategy, is responding with yet another futile war. It's insane to think a protracted war in the Red Sea will make the Red Sea safe for commercial shipping, but this is where the logic of the Combination Genocide And Regional War leads. As has been the case since January 2024, the U.S. (and the rest of the world) can have, right now, the safe Red Sea shipping lanes it wants. All it has to do is make Israel progress to the second phase of the ceasefire. Instead, on CNN yesterday, Witkoff said that the U.S. strikes against the Houthis over the weekend "ought to inform Hamas as to where we stand as regard to terrorism and our tolerance level for terrorist actions." That sounded to me like an implied threat: that the U.S. could cut out the Israeli middleman and drop U.S. weapons on Gaza itself. Additionally, the Trump administration is threatening Iran to break with the Houthis. The leader of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps said in response that "Iran will respond decisively and destructively if they carry out their threats." Whatever develops, right now, 53 Yemenis are dead, the first of what sounds like many more to come in this new phase of the regional war. IT WAS NEVER ONLY GOING TO BE MAHMOUD KHALIL. Leqaa Kordia, another Columbia student protesting for Palestine, has been taken into Department of Homeland Security custody and accused of overstaying her student visa. Another student, Ranjani Srinavasan, returned to India rather than face detention and deportation following the revocation of her visa—which, per her lawyers, happened despite her attending only a handful of Columbia protests and not the occupation of Hind's Hall. And a doctor affiliated with Brown University who held a valid visa issued earlier this month, Dr. Rasha Alawieh, was detained at Logan Airport and deported to Lebanon in spite of an explicit judicial order. As with mass deportation more broadly, the Trump administration is not and has never intended to draw distinctions, and attempting to draw them—between Good Protester and Bad Protester—is to miss the point of what's happening here. The deputy attorney general is looking to impose terrorism charges despite how blatantly ridiculous they would be. The assertion of power to suppress not only speech but solidarity is what is happening here, and everything else is time-wasting commentary. [Columbia University, as well, is enthusiastic to capitulate. The university has expelled and suspended students and revoked degrees, earning it nothing more than the Trump administration's increasing control over its campus. There's a lesson here about compliance! – Sam] At the same time, credit to Michel Martin of NPR for this excellent grilling of Deputy Homeland Security Secretary Troy Edgar. MEANWHILE, THE JEWISH FASCIST GANG BETAR is making lists of "deportable" supporters of Palestine and sending them to the Trump administration. It's a disgusting betrayal of Jewish history, but a logical progression for those who embrace profaning their history in support of what Peter Beinart has called idolatry. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Without the American press even noticing, Donald Trump has started a war with Iran. On February 28, the U.S. military announced that two B-52 heavy bombers flying from an “undisclosed location” in the Middle East (which I can report is the country of Qatar) dropped bombs on another “undisclosed location” (Iraq). The message wasn’t lost on neighboring Iran, whose state media warned that the B-52s are “nuclear-capable bombers” carrying a message whose recipient “was clear as day; The Islamic Republic of Iran.”
 Clear as day in the Middle East, perhaps, but not in the U.S., where the show of force was barely reported at all. The Pentagon, masters of obscuring controversial things they’re doing behind sleep-inducing jargon, insisted that the B-52 exercises were merely “to assure regional partners,” to “support security and stability in the region,” and so on. Then on March 9, a second bomber demonstration was made: U.S. B-52s flew alongside Israeli fighter jets on long-range missions, practicing aerial refueling and joint operations. Again the American press missed the story; though not the Israeli press, which correctly reported the real purpose of the operation — “readying the Israeli military for a potential joint strike with the U.S. on Iran.” The military preparations culminated this weekend in a set of U.S. airstrikes on Houthi leadership in Yemen. On Sunday, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz bragged to ABC that the operation “took out” top Houthi officials, making it very clear that this is all about Iran. Watlz said in his interview:
At that point, I thought the news media would finally get the message. But the coverage instead adhered to the sterile language of the Pentagon, framing the strikes as focused on logistical targets and a mere continuation of the Biden administration’s small-bore strategy of degrading Houthi capabilities. A representative example appears in the New York Times’ Sunday article on the attack, calling the attack “similar” to those of the Biden administration. Per the article:
In The New York Times’ telling, there’s nothing to see here; new boss same as the old. But Biden never targeted Houthi leadership elements in his strikes! Trump has entered into uncharted waters. The media, meanwhile, echoes the Pentagon’s framing of the Houthi strikes as intended “to restore freedom of navigation” in the Red Sea, as U.S. Central Command said in its one-sentence long press release on the strike. Today, Trump went out of his way to advertise that the audience for this operation was Iran. Writing on Truth Social, Trump said, “Every shot fired by the Houthis will be looked upon, from this point forward, as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of IRAN, and IRAN will be held responsible, and suffer the consequences, and those consequences will be dire!”
Little noticed amid the torrent of headlines about Elon Musk, DOGE, and the budget fight, Trump’s rhetoric is alarmingly combative. Earlier this month, Trump said he had told Iran in a letter, “I hope you’re going to negotiate, because if we have to go in militarily, it’s going to be a terrible thing for them.” “Do whatever the hell you want,” Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said in response, seemingly slamming the door shut on any attempts to pull back from the conflict. Go in militarily? That seems like something we should debate publicly, but that hasn’t happened. Google searches for “war with Iran” spiked several times last year but have almost flatlined since Trump won the election.
Trump has embraced what he calls a “maximum pressure” policy on Iran but nobody seems much interested in what that means. Now he’s attacking in Yemen, signaling more to come, and preparing for an even larger campaign to fight Iran directly. In order to prevent a war you first have to admit you’re fighting in one. The media seems wholly unwilling to do this, instead parroting the Pentagon’s assurances that this is all perfectly normal. Go back to bed, America! Tomorrow I’ll report on the Pentagon’s Iran war plans. |
